"No political event or circumstance can be evaluated without the knowledge of the Vatican's part in it. And no significant world situation exists in which the Vatican does not play an important explicit or implicit role." Avro Manhattan, "Protestant" Knight of Malta, English historian and agitator, 1960: The Vatican and World Politics
"The Jesuits offer the world at large a system of theology by which every law, Divine and human, may be broken with impunity, and by which the very Bulls of Popes may be defied. It is a ghastly religion. It is a religion to be abhorred by all honest and honorable men." M. F. Cusack, converted Nun of Kenmare, 1896: The Black Pope
"The Jesuits laugh at us. And during their hilarity, the rattlesnake is coiled at our feet, climbing to strike us in the heart." Edwin A. Sherman, American Shriner Freemason, Friend of Charles Chiniquy, 1883: The Engineer Corps Of Hell
You could call Eric Jon Phelps a controversial author. We know him as a consummate researcher, a beloved friend, and a gentleman who lives his truth. Our readers will know him best as my interviewee in our now infamous May 2000 issue of The Spectrum that is known far and wide as the "Black Pope" paper. Eric is also the author of the Blockbuster Book Vatican Assassins, an incredibly well researched historical manuscript which shows the reader, in astonishing detail, where the true diabolical power and control of this planet resides, at least that controlling layer which is in the physical dimension.
Vatican Assassins likewise acquaints the reader with a number of priceless old documents and historical manuscripts that "certain ones" have done their very best to remove from almost all of the world's library shelves. Most of these documents are so rare that just getting these back into public access and circulation is a great service to all students of history thirsty for the truth.
There has been so much interest in what Eric has to say that we decided to revisit a number of issues and ask him to answer some dangling questions. After all, the kind of connections which Eric makes are an entire level deeper than what we are used to hearing in the "conspiracy theory" arena. Moreover, we have noted, with some degree of surprise and "unveiling" over the past year or so, just who all have come forward to attack Eric's work, groundlessly and hysterically (but never to his face). These ones know who they are and have, by their unprofessional and irrational actions, convincingly revealed just who they really work for, while pretending to be presenters of truth!
While it was my intent to focus the majority of the conversation on the present day, there were some unresolved issues from the past that likewise required clarification. On June 18, 2001, I had an opportunity to sit down with Eric Phelps, face-to-face, and prevail upon him to answer a few key questions. Let's see what he has to say.
Martin) Our last interview, the "Black Pope" issue of The Spectrum, went around the world a few times. It's also been on the Internet for quite some time. The manuscript of Vatican Assassins has been distributed, but still no book. What's happening with the book? Why is it taking so long to come out in book form?
Phelps) The reason why it has taken a year to finalize the book is because there were several historical mistakes that were corrected by some of the readers of the manuscripts, the first and second manuscripts. There was a Japanese individual named Toichi [Ryu] who corrected me on some of the Japanese history regarding the Emperors and the Shoguns, for which I thanked him and made the necessary changes. There were a few other similar changes that I had to make with regard to dates, places, and some times; just a polishing-up of the manuscript, so that it's ready now. We had one individual who was a Jesuit for 10 years. He got out of the Jesuit Order. He read the manuscript. He greatly approved of it. And he sent us a list of corrections, which we incorporated into the manuscript. So, there have been many people who have added their polishing touches to it, for which I am thankful.
Martin) I would like to concentrate this conversation largely on the present day. But, before we get to the present, I would ask you to, once and for all, clarify something for our readers who may be still confused about The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. There have been many sources and many recitings of The Protocols. They've been called a fraud. They've been called a forgery, which means that there was a document that preceded it that it had to be based on. Everyone seems to point to the Jews, or the Khazars, as the authors of The Protocols, and yet your research indicates otherwise.
Phelps) Cardinal Bea was the confessor of Pope Pius XII (Hitler's Pope), a very powerful Jesuit and Cardinal within the Vatican. According to Alberto Rivera, when speaking with Cardinal Bea, Cardinal Bea said to him that The Protocols were written by Jews loyal to the Pope. I do not believe Jews wrote The Protocols. I do not believe Alberto Rivera was told the whole story, because he did not have a "need to know". Withholding information has always been standard procedure for the Jesuits.
I believe men who were loyal to the Pope wrote The Protocols, and the men who were loyal to the Pope who wrote The Protocols were the Jesuits, according to Leo Lehmann, the ex-Irish Catholic priest who became converted to Christ and set-up the mission there in New York City, Converted Catholics For Christ. He said that the Jesuits wrote The Protocols, and that this is no new attempt of deception, based on their document that they wrote concerning their attack on the Jansenists, which was called The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine.
So, the Jesuits wrote The Protocols like they wrote The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine, and the language of The Protocols is identical to the Secret Meeting at Cheiri [1825].
However, I have a quotation from a very brilliant and Godly, born-again, Bible-believing, Irish Roman Catholic priest I referred to a moment ago. He wrote a book entitled Behind The Dictators, first written in 1942, and there were two editions after that. I have the 1945 edition. Dr. Leo Lehmann says that the Jesuits wrote The Protocols. But before I get into that, I would just like to read to you who Dr. L. H. Lehmann was.
"He was born in Dublin, Ireland, and received his primary education there from the nuns and Christian brothers. He began his study for the priesthood at Mungret College, Limerick, and at All Hallows College, Dublin. In 1918, he went to finish his theological studies at the University of Propaganda Fide in Rome, where he was ordained a priest in 1921. He later studied at New York University from which he received the degree of M.A. [...] After four years as a priest in Cape Town, South Africa, Dr. Lehmann was recalled to Rome to continue negotiations at the Vatican courts concerning a legal case in which he had been engaged, while a student in Rome, on behalf of many American bishops and priests against the Jesuits. He later returned to South Africa, but was transferred to the United States in 1927 and appointed pastor in Gainesville, the university city of Florida. Dr. Lehmann is now director of Christ's Mission in New York City and Editor-in-chief of The Converted Catholic magazine."
So, here is a born-again, Bible-believing man who had been an Irish priest, who had run-ins with the Jesuits, who knew exactly what they were all about. When you're involved in litigation within the Vatican, you know the law. And you know the history of who you are opposing. Here is what he had to say about the origin of The Protocols. This is found in his book, Behind The Dictators, on page 15: "Although first published in Russia in 1903, The Protocols of [the Learned Elders of] Zion had their origin in France and date from the Dreyfus Affair, of which the Jesuits were the chief instigators. They were planned also first to take effect in France, by the overthrow of the 'Judaic-Masonic' government of the French Republic. But the discovery of the gigantic fraud of Leo Taxil, who had been openly supported by the Jesuits, the concluding of the Franco-Russian alliance, along with the Vatican's difficulties with the French government at that time, made it more opportune to have them appear first in Russia. [...] These Protocols of supposedly Jewish leaders are not the first documents of their kind fabricated by the Jesuits. [...] For over a hundred years before these Protocols appeared, the Jesuits had continued to make use of a similar fraud called The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine against Jansenism, an anti-Jesuit French Catholic movement among the secular clergy."
I might also add that the Jansenists were what we would call, really, Catholic Calvinists. They believed in the sovereignty of God. They believed in justification by faith. They believed in many Biblical doctrines, and therefore the Jesuits hated them and later got the Pope to issue a Bull against them. The Jesuits so hated the Jansenists, of which Blaise Pascal was one, that they concocted this document, The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine, against them.
Martin) What year was this?
Phelps) This was in the 1600s, I believe, in France. It may have been the late 1600s, because Blaise Pascal wrote his Provincial Letters in the later 1600s.
[Editor's note: Eric brings to our attention a very interesting person here, much like the great Nikola Tesla of a few hundred years later. Blaise Pascal, 1623-62, was a great mathematician, physicist, theologian, and man-of-letters, born in Clermont-Ferrand, France. In 1647 he invented a calculating machine, and later the barometer, the hydraulic press, and the syringe. Until 1654 he spent his time between mathematics (remember Pascal's triangle and other intriguing mathematical and geometric discoveries?) and the social round in Paris, but a mystical experience that year led him to join his sister, who was a member of the Jansenist convent at Port-Royal, where he defended Jansenism against the Jesuits in Lettres Provinciales, 1656-7.]
Now, I'll go back to my reading: "The analogy between the two forgeries is perfect. The secret assemblage in the forest of Bourg-Fontaine, the plan of the 'conspirators' to destroy the Papacy and establish religious tolerance among all nations, the alleged plot against Throne and Altar, and the setting up of a world-government in opposition to the Catholic Church. There is the same dramatization of the negative pole of the historic evolution of the world, in order to bring out, by contrast, the positive Christian [Catholic] pole, around which all conservative forces – the monarchy, the aristocracy, the army, the clergy – must gather to save the world from Satan's onslaught."
Is this not identical to The Protocols? Except in The Protocols, it's Communism. Both documents want a world government, under someone other than the Pope. So, it betrays the Jesuit hand throughout, in The Protocols, based upon The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine, and furthermore, after this document, The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine, the next major document that we have is Leone's The Jesuit Conspiracy, the Secret Plan of the Order, which was published in 1848. In this document, Jesuit Leone was 19 years old and a novitiate in Cheiri, Italy, where he, when he was snooping around in a back room, became trapped when Jesuit General Roothaan and his provincials came in another room and he listened to this conversation between the General and his provincials – in the mid-1830s, around 1834 – and while he was hiding, he was taking notes.
They betray that the Jesuit General was intent upon setting-up a World Government by controlling the Roman Catholic hierarchy, the Pope, all the monarchies, and thus all the governments of the world. And that is in Leone's great work, The Jesuit Conspiracy, published in 1848. It was published in several languages. It went all throughout Europe, which contributed to the people rising-up against the power of the Jesuits in 1848, with the Second French Revolution. But that revolution was controlled, the leadership of it was controlled, and the end result was more power for the Jesuit Order in Europe.
Martin) You mention that The Protocols were an outgrowth of the Dreyfus Affair. And prior to that we have the Council of Trent [twenty-five sessions of the Council of Trent from 1545-1563]. Can you put this in perspective?
Phelps) Ok. The Jesuits were busy creating Jewish hatred in Germany and in France in the late 1800s. There was a man referred to in John Ridpath's universal History of the World – I only found this here – he called his work "the solution to the Jewish question". Hitler came along, later, and had the final solution to the Jewish question. So, they were fomenting anti-Jewish hatred in Germany, and they were fomenting anti-Jewish hatred in France.
Martin) Who are they?
Phelps) The Jesuits. The Jesuits were fomenting this in both countries because, at this time, the Jesuits had been expelled from Germany in 1872, and they had been expelled from France in 1880. So now they're going to go after the Jews through their agents in these two countries. In France, they started the Dreyfus Affair, and that was in the 1890s. The Dreyfus Affair had several purposes. It was to create anti-Semitism, anti-Jewish hatred in France.
I hate to use the word anti-Semitism. There are many Semites other than Jews. And it was also calculated to create war with Germany, because Captain Dreyfus was accused of treason in handing secrets over to the German government. It was all a frame.
He was completely framed. He was sent to Devil's Island for 10 years, and suffered the horrible tortures of Devil's Island for that period of time. And then, later, when he was brought back, he was vindicated and found "not guilty", and the Jesuits were blamed for having done this. So this became universally known in France, which ultimately caused the Jesuits to be expelled, again, in 1901.
The Dreyfus Affair is a major European conspiracy with the Jesuit hand, against the Jews, attempting to foment a war between France and Germany. Because, remember, the French hated the Germans as a result of the trouncing that they got in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. And they wanted vengeance for that. So, we play on the people's vengeance, create this issue between Germany and France, we use the Jews to do it so we can get some anti-Jewish fervor going, which ultimately manifests itself in 1942 with the Vichy government in France, when they help the Nazis round-up all the Jews in France and send them to Auschwitz.
And it's at that time, in 1942, in the Petain, that the Jesuits were formally readmitted into France. That's the significance of the Dreyfus Affair.
Martin) And what is the significance of the Council of Trent in relation to all of these?
Phelps) The Council of Trent puts heretics, which us Bible-believers are, all Protestants and all Jews, puts all of us under more than 100 curses because of what we believe:
We believe in justification by faith. "Accursed be all who believe in justification by faith."
We believe that Baptism is simply an outward sign of salvation, and that it is not necessary for salvation. "Accursed be all those who believe that."
We believe that, when we eat of the Lord's supper, the bread and the wine are not the literal body and blood of Christ, as the Council of Trent teaches, therefore we are accursed because we do not believe in transubstantiation.
And we also believe that man has a right to his own judgment. He has a right to read the Bible and make his own decisions as to what it means, that the Bible should be in the language of the people, because this the foundation of freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press.
All of these things in the 4th session of the Council of Trent are condemned, anybody who believes in freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press.
So, those maxims of the Council of Trent are brought into The Protocols when The Protocols condemn freedom of conscience. They condemn freedom of the press. They condemn national governments and national sovereignty.
You see, Bible-believers, we believe in national sovereignty.
We do not believe in World Government.
We believe America should be governed by Americans.
We believe Japan should be governed by Japanese, etc.
We do not believe, we do not want, a European Union.
We do not want a combination of governments under Centralized Government.
We believe in national sovereignties, which is the reason why the South seceded and left the United States, because they wanted to set-up their own national sovereignty. It was a Protestant maxim upon which they acted.
Ok, so Trent effects The Protocols. Trent effects The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine. Trent effects The Secret Plan, written by Leone in 1848. And hence, now we have the doctrines of Communism effecting Marx and his Communist Manifesto, because Marx was tutored in the British Museum by Jesuits.
Martin) Who was behind the Council of Trent, The Secret Plan, etc. Who were the men behind these, historically?
Phelps) Well, Diego Laynez went on to be the Jesuit General after Loyola. Laynez was the second Jesuit General. He was the master-mind of the Council of Trent. Laynez was a Jesuit by allegiance, and a Jew by race. This is very important. And it's the result of Laynez being a Jew, when this was brought to light in 1593, that the Order passed a statute that no Jew could ever be in the Jesuit order again. This is very important. This is why Weishaupt was not a Jew. It was against the constitutions of the Order for a Jew to be in the Order.
Martin) And what relation does Weishaupt have to all of this?
Phelps) Weishaupt was the promoter of the Illuminati, with the House of Rothschild, for the punishment of the Catholic monarchs of Europe, and the Pope, for suppressing the Jesuit Order.
So, Weishaupt did not act alone. Weishaupt was under the supervision, at least initially, of Jesuit General Ricci, who died in 1775 in Italy. Weishaupt was under orders.
Martin) Who is Jesuit General Roothaan?
Phelps) Jesuit General Roothaan was the General of the Society from the 1830s to the mid-1850s. Jesuit General Roothaan was the one who oversaw the Secret Plan at Chieri, of which Leone overheard and then wrote about.
Martin) So this is key to what we are talking about?
Phelps: Extremely key.
Martin) And who is Peter Beckx?
Phelps) Peter Beckx was the Jesuit General in the late 1800s and early 1900s. He was the one who gave the order and oversaw the sinking of the Titanic.
Martin) Let's talk about that now. Why have you drawn the historical conclusion that the Jesuits sank the Titanic?
Phelps) Because they benefited. And they were present, on site, on the ship, prior to it's sinking. When we have a powerful organization that is working together, such as the Jesuit Order, and the power that they had prior to their suppression, and that they had never changed, and they are still working toward a World Government under the Pope, we look for the Jesuit Order in these national crises that arise, and in this issue, the Titanic.
We must ask the question: Even though we can't place where they are at the moment, did the Jesuit Order benefit from this? And the answer is: Yes, they did.
They benefited because it paved the way for the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank, which they own and control, by proxy, through the Knights of Malta, with their various trusts and so on. They never own anything outright, they always own it through a trusted third party.
How do we know that the Jesuits control the Federal Reserve Bank? Because the Federal Reserve Bank was used to finance the second "Thirty Years War" from 1914 to 1945 in which everything that transpired fell out for the benefit of the Vatican, everything.
published on February 23, 2008 by Arthur Cristian
"The Jesuits offer the world at large a system of theology by which every law, Divine and human, may be broken with impunity, and by which the very Bulls of Popes may be defied. It is a ghastly religion. It is a religion to be abhorred by all honest and honorable men." M. F. Cusack, converted Nun of Kenmare, 1896: The Black Pope
"The Jesuits laugh at us. And during their hilarity, the rattlesnake is coiled at our feet, climbing to strike us in the heart." Edwin A. Sherman, American Shriner Freemason, Friend of Charles Chiniquy, 1883: The Engineer Corps Of Hell
You could call Eric Jon Phelps a controversial author. We know him as a consummate researcher, a beloved friend, and a gentleman who lives his truth. Our readers will know him best as my interviewee in our now infamous May 2000 issue of The Spectrum that is known far and wide as the "Black Pope" paper. Eric is also the author of the Blockbuster Book Vatican Assassins, an incredibly well researched historical manuscript which shows the reader, in astonishing detail, where the true diabolical power and control of this planet resides, at least that controlling layer which is in the physical dimension.
Vatican Assassins likewise acquaints the reader with a number of priceless old documents and historical manuscripts that "certain ones" have done their very best to remove from almost all of the world's library shelves. Most of these documents are so rare that just getting these back into public access and circulation is a great service to all students of history thirsty for the truth.
There has been so much interest in what Eric has to say that we decided to revisit a number of issues and ask him to answer some dangling questions. After all, the kind of connections which Eric makes are an entire level deeper than what we are used to hearing in the "conspiracy theory" arena. Moreover, we have noted, with some degree of surprise and "unveiling" over the past year or so, just who all have come forward to attack Eric's work, groundlessly and hysterically (but never to his face). These ones know who they are and have, by their unprofessional and irrational actions, convincingly revealed just who they really work for, while pretending to be presenters of truth!
While it was my intent to focus the majority of the conversation on the present day, there were some unresolved issues from the past that likewise required clarification. On June 18, 2001, I had an opportunity to sit down with Eric Phelps, face-to-face, and prevail upon him to answer a few key questions. Let's see what he has to say.
Martin) Our last interview, the "Black Pope" issue of The Spectrum, went around the world a few times. It's also been on the Internet for quite some time. The manuscript of Vatican Assassins has been distributed, but still no book. What's happening with the book? Why is it taking so long to come out in book form?
Phelps) The reason why it has taken a year to finalize the book is because there were several historical mistakes that were corrected by some of the readers of the manuscripts, the first and second manuscripts. There was a Japanese individual named Toichi [Ryu] who corrected me on some of the Japanese history regarding the Emperors and the Shoguns, for which I thanked him and made the necessary changes. There were a few other similar changes that I had to make with regard to dates, places, and some times; just a polishing-up of the manuscript, so that it's ready now. We had one individual who was a Jesuit for 10 years. He got out of the Jesuit Order. He read the manuscript. He greatly approved of it. And he sent us a list of corrections, which we incorporated into the manuscript. So, there have been many people who have added their polishing touches to it, for which I am thankful.
Martin) I would like to concentrate this conversation largely on the present day. But, before we get to the present, I would ask you to, once and for all, clarify something for our readers who may be still confused about The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. There have been many sources and many recitings of The Protocols. They've been called a fraud. They've been called a forgery, which means that there was a document that preceded it that it had to be based on. Everyone seems to point to the Jews, or the Khazars, as the authors of The Protocols, and yet your research indicates otherwise.
Phelps) Cardinal Bea was the confessor of Pope Pius XII (Hitler's Pope), a very powerful Jesuit and Cardinal within the Vatican. According to Alberto Rivera, when speaking with Cardinal Bea, Cardinal Bea said to him that The Protocols were written by Jews loyal to the Pope. I do not believe Jews wrote The Protocols. I do not believe Alberto Rivera was told the whole story, because he did not have a "need to know". Withholding information has always been standard procedure for the Jesuits.
I believe men who were loyal to the Pope wrote The Protocols, and the men who were loyal to the Pope who wrote The Protocols were the Jesuits, according to Leo Lehmann, the ex-Irish Catholic priest who became converted to Christ and set-up the mission there in New York City, Converted Catholics For Christ. He said that the Jesuits wrote The Protocols, and that this is no new attempt of deception, based on their document that they wrote concerning their attack on the Jansenists, which was called The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine.
So, the Jesuits wrote The Protocols like they wrote The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine, and the language of The Protocols is identical to the Secret Meeting at Cheiri [1825].
However, I have a quotation from a very brilliant and Godly, born-again, Bible-believing, Irish Roman Catholic priest I referred to a moment ago. He wrote a book entitled Behind The Dictators, first written in 1942, and there were two editions after that. I have the 1945 edition. Dr. Leo Lehmann says that the Jesuits wrote The Protocols. But before I get into that, I would just like to read to you who Dr. L. H. Lehmann was.
"He was born in Dublin, Ireland, and received his primary education there from the nuns and Christian brothers. He began his study for the priesthood at Mungret College, Limerick, and at All Hallows College, Dublin. In 1918, he went to finish his theological studies at the University of Propaganda Fide in Rome, where he was ordained a priest in 1921. He later studied at New York University from which he received the degree of M.A. [...] After four years as a priest in Cape Town, South Africa, Dr. Lehmann was recalled to Rome to continue negotiations at the Vatican courts concerning a legal case in which he had been engaged, while a student in Rome, on behalf of many American bishops and priests against the Jesuits. He later returned to South Africa, but was transferred to the United States in 1927 and appointed pastor in Gainesville, the university city of Florida. Dr. Lehmann is now director of Christ's Mission in New York City and Editor-in-chief of The Converted Catholic magazine."
So, here is a born-again, Bible-believing man who had been an Irish priest, who had run-ins with the Jesuits, who knew exactly what they were all about. When you're involved in litigation within the Vatican, you know the law. And you know the history of who you are opposing. Here is what he had to say about the origin of The Protocols. This is found in his book, Behind The Dictators, on page 15: "Although first published in Russia in 1903, The Protocols of [the Learned Elders of] Zion had their origin in France and date from the Dreyfus Affair, of which the Jesuits were the chief instigators. They were planned also first to take effect in France, by the overthrow of the 'Judaic-Masonic' government of the French Republic. But the discovery of the gigantic fraud of Leo Taxil, who had been openly supported by the Jesuits, the concluding of the Franco-Russian alliance, along with the Vatican's difficulties with the French government at that time, made it more opportune to have them appear first in Russia. [...] These Protocols of supposedly Jewish leaders are not the first documents of their kind fabricated by the Jesuits. [...] For over a hundred years before these Protocols appeared, the Jesuits had continued to make use of a similar fraud called The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine against Jansenism, an anti-Jesuit French Catholic movement among the secular clergy."
I might also add that the Jansenists were what we would call, really, Catholic Calvinists. They believed in the sovereignty of God. They believed in justification by faith. They believed in many Biblical doctrines, and therefore the Jesuits hated them and later got the Pope to issue a Bull against them. The Jesuits so hated the Jansenists, of which Blaise Pascal was one, that they concocted this document, The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine, against them.
Martin) What year was this?
Phelps) This was in the 1600s, I believe, in France. It may have been the late 1600s, because Blaise Pascal wrote his Provincial Letters in the later 1600s.
[Editor's note: Eric brings to our attention a very interesting person here, much like the great Nikola Tesla of a few hundred years later. Blaise Pascal, 1623-62, was a great mathematician, physicist, theologian, and man-of-letters, born in Clermont-Ferrand, France. In 1647 he invented a calculating machine, and later the barometer, the hydraulic press, and the syringe. Until 1654 he spent his time between mathematics (remember Pascal's triangle and other intriguing mathematical and geometric discoveries?) and the social round in Paris, but a mystical experience that year led him to join his sister, who was a member of the Jansenist convent at Port-Royal, where he defended Jansenism against the Jesuits in Lettres Provinciales, 1656-7.]
Now, I'll go back to my reading: "The analogy between the two forgeries is perfect. The secret assemblage in the forest of Bourg-Fontaine, the plan of the 'conspirators' to destroy the Papacy and establish religious tolerance among all nations, the alleged plot against Throne and Altar, and the setting up of a world-government in opposition to the Catholic Church. There is the same dramatization of the negative pole of the historic evolution of the world, in order to bring out, by contrast, the positive Christian [Catholic] pole, around which all conservative forces – the monarchy, the aristocracy, the army, the clergy – must gather to save the world from Satan's onslaught."
Is this not identical to The Protocols? Except in The Protocols, it's Communism. Both documents want a world government, under someone other than the Pope. So, it betrays the Jesuit hand throughout, in The Protocols, based upon The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine, and furthermore, after this document, The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine, the next major document that we have is Leone's The Jesuit Conspiracy, the Secret Plan of the Order, which was published in 1848. In this document, Jesuit Leone was 19 years old and a novitiate in Cheiri, Italy, where he, when he was snooping around in a back room, became trapped when Jesuit General Roothaan and his provincials came in another room and he listened to this conversation between the General and his provincials – in the mid-1830s, around 1834 – and while he was hiding, he was taking notes.
They betray that the Jesuit General was intent upon setting-up a World Government by controlling the Roman Catholic hierarchy, the Pope, all the monarchies, and thus all the governments of the world. And that is in Leone's great work, The Jesuit Conspiracy, published in 1848. It was published in several languages. It went all throughout Europe, which contributed to the people rising-up against the power of the Jesuits in 1848, with the Second French Revolution. But that revolution was controlled, the leadership of it was controlled, and the end result was more power for the Jesuit Order in Europe.
Martin) You mention that The Protocols were an outgrowth of the Dreyfus Affair. And prior to that we have the Council of Trent [twenty-five sessions of the Council of Trent from 1545-1563]. Can you put this in perspective?
Phelps) Ok. The Jesuits were busy creating Jewish hatred in Germany and in France in the late 1800s. There was a man referred to in John Ridpath's universal History of the World – I only found this here – he called his work "the solution to the Jewish question". Hitler came along, later, and had the final solution to the Jewish question. So, they were fomenting anti-Jewish hatred in Germany, and they were fomenting anti-Jewish hatred in France.
Martin) Who are they?
Phelps) The Jesuits. The Jesuits were fomenting this in both countries because, at this time, the Jesuits had been expelled from Germany in 1872, and they had been expelled from France in 1880. So now they're going to go after the Jews through their agents in these two countries. In France, they started the Dreyfus Affair, and that was in the 1890s. The Dreyfus Affair had several purposes. It was to create anti-Semitism, anti-Jewish hatred in France.
I hate to use the word anti-Semitism. There are many Semites other than Jews. And it was also calculated to create war with Germany, because Captain Dreyfus was accused of treason in handing secrets over to the German government. It was all a frame.
He was completely framed. He was sent to Devil's Island for 10 years, and suffered the horrible tortures of Devil's Island for that period of time. And then, later, when he was brought back, he was vindicated and found "not guilty", and the Jesuits were blamed for having done this. So this became universally known in France, which ultimately caused the Jesuits to be expelled, again, in 1901.
The Dreyfus Affair is a major European conspiracy with the Jesuit hand, against the Jews, attempting to foment a war between France and Germany. Because, remember, the French hated the Germans as a result of the trouncing that they got in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. And they wanted vengeance for that. So, we play on the people's vengeance, create this issue between Germany and France, we use the Jews to do it so we can get some anti-Jewish fervor going, which ultimately manifests itself in 1942 with the Vichy government in France, when they help the Nazis round-up all the Jews in France and send them to Auschwitz.
And it's at that time, in 1942, in the Petain, that the Jesuits were formally readmitted into France. That's the significance of the Dreyfus Affair.
Martin) And what is the significance of the Council of Trent in relation to all of these?
Phelps) The Council of Trent puts heretics, which us Bible-believers are, all Protestants and all Jews, puts all of us under more than 100 curses because of what we believe:
We believe in justification by faith. "Accursed be all who believe in justification by faith."
We believe that Baptism is simply an outward sign of salvation, and that it is not necessary for salvation. "Accursed be all those who believe that."
We believe that, when we eat of the Lord's supper, the bread and the wine are not the literal body and blood of Christ, as the Council of Trent teaches, therefore we are accursed because we do not believe in transubstantiation.
And we also believe that man has a right to his own judgment. He has a right to read the Bible and make his own decisions as to what it means, that the Bible should be in the language of the people, because this the foundation of freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press.
All of these things in the 4th session of the Council of Trent are condemned, anybody who believes in freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press.
So, those maxims of the Council of Trent are brought into The Protocols when The Protocols condemn freedom of conscience. They condemn freedom of the press. They condemn national governments and national sovereignty.
You see, Bible-believers, we believe in national sovereignty.
We do not believe in World Government.
We believe America should be governed by Americans.
We believe Japan should be governed by Japanese, etc.
We do not believe, we do not want, a European Union.
We do not want a combination of governments under Centralized Government.
We believe in national sovereignties, which is the reason why the South seceded and left the United States, because they wanted to set-up their own national sovereignty. It was a Protestant maxim upon which they acted.
Ok, so Trent effects The Protocols. Trent effects The Secrets of the Elders of Bourge-Fontaine. Trent effects The Secret Plan, written by Leone in 1848. And hence, now we have the doctrines of Communism effecting Marx and his Communist Manifesto, because Marx was tutored in the British Museum by Jesuits.
Martin) Who was behind the Council of Trent, The Secret Plan, etc. Who were the men behind these, historically?
Phelps) Well, Diego Laynez went on to be the Jesuit General after Loyola. Laynez was the second Jesuit General. He was the master-mind of the Council of Trent. Laynez was a Jesuit by allegiance, and a Jew by race. This is very important. And it's the result of Laynez being a Jew, when this was brought to light in 1593, that the Order passed a statute that no Jew could ever be in the Jesuit order again. This is very important. This is why Weishaupt was not a Jew. It was against the constitutions of the Order for a Jew to be in the Order.
Martin) And what relation does Weishaupt have to all of this?
Phelps) Weishaupt was the promoter of the Illuminati, with the House of Rothschild, for the punishment of the Catholic monarchs of Europe, and the Pope, for suppressing the Jesuit Order.
So, Weishaupt did not act alone. Weishaupt was under the supervision, at least initially, of Jesuit General Ricci, who died in 1775 in Italy. Weishaupt was under orders.
Martin) Who is Jesuit General Roothaan?
Phelps) Jesuit General Roothaan was the General of the Society from the 1830s to the mid-1850s. Jesuit General Roothaan was the one who oversaw the Secret Plan at Chieri, of which Leone overheard and then wrote about.
Martin) So this is key to what we are talking about?
Phelps: Extremely key.
Martin) And who is Peter Beckx?
Phelps) Peter Beckx was the Jesuit General in the late 1800s and early 1900s. He was the one who gave the order and oversaw the sinking of the Titanic.
Martin) Let's talk about that now. Why have you drawn the historical conclusion that the Jesuits sank the Titanic?
Phelps) Because they benefited. And they were present, on site, on the ship, prior to it's sinking. When we have a powerful organization that is working together, such as the Jesuit Order, and the power that they had prior to their suppression, and that they had never changed, and they are still working toward a World Government under the Pope, we look for the Jesuit Order in these national crises that arise, and in this issue, the Titanic.
We must ask the question: Even though we can't place where they are at the moment, did the Jesuit Order benefit from this? And the answer is: Yes, they did.
They benefited because it paved the way for the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank, which they own and control, by proxy, through the Knights of Malta, with their various trusts and so on. They never own anything outright, they always own it through a trusted third party.
How do we know that the Jesuits control the Federal Reserve Bank? Because the Federal Reserve Bank was used to finance the second "Thirty Years War" from 1914 to 1945 in which everything that transpired fell out for the benefit of the Vatican, everything.
published on February 23, 2008 by Arthur Cristian
